Subscribe for updates

Sunday, June 18, 2023

Meditation, Mindfulness, Mental Models

Mindfulness Update

I am writing a tome for my grandkids: A Note To Self - what I wish I had known when I turned 26 and thought I knew everything! The first chapter is on Mindfulness - because it turned out to be my long term salvation and gift. Rather than make you wait for the ultimate publication of my weighty book, here’s a synopsis of that first chapter. I think it is important to life itself, so there. 

I started meditating in 1956 when I entered the seminary. For 13 years in religious life I meditated for 30 minutes each morning. No one taught me how. I read about it, and just worked at it. More recently, I have been researching just how this works, and I think I have figured out a little of what is going on. This is based on some neuroscience and psychology research which you can see in the References.

Meditation is often called "mindfulness." I prefer that term because it fits very well with what I have learned. There are at least three stages to the skill at my level. It is my impression that there are many “higher” levels, but I have no experience of those. My guess is that most practitioners would put all of my levels at the beginner stage - and that is just fine.

Metacognition A good name for the first stage is “metacognition.”  With some work you can gain an awareness of what is going on in your brain, and you get some ability to manage that. It takes a bit of work to get to the point where you can even recognize what is going on, and become fully aware of it. The simplest techniques I have found are Transcendental Meditation, Breathing awareness, and The Relaxation Response. They are all very similar, and very simple. You can read more about those in the references.

Our brain is not doing just one thing at a time. When people first try this exercise, they are usually amazed at the level of activity. I recently heard a podcast discussion between Sam Harris and Yuval Noah Hararii. Both are avid practitioners of mindfulness. Harari said the first time he tried this, in graduate school at Oxford, he was simply astounded by how much was going on, and how little control he had over it. He said that he now meditates 2 hours each day. That and writing three best selling books!  Works for me. (Harris #3)

There are thousands of things going on in our brain that are necessary to maintain our life and well being. A few of these come to the surface of consciousness when the brain thinks it is important. For example, the lion on the trail should generate a response in my muscles and adrenalin to flee - and that will happen before I am even aware of seeing a lion. When I encounter a stranger, my brain does an immediate pattern recognition exercise, and tries to determine if this person is friend or foe, and what kind of person they are. It does that in a subsecond. If I have learned to pay attention - the first stage of metacognition - I might be able to see that happen.

We put  a mental model of the world on top of our experience all the time. We tell our internal story of what we see and do. And this is generally not conscious. I was persuaded of this when I realized one day that I was making a mental judgment on every single person I met, and finding them to be less capable than myself. I was not even aware of this - and it was coloring and affecting my whole life. I was absolutely stunned when I finally realized this. I will expand that experience at the end of this.

The first step then is to simply recognize what is going on, and to learn to get to a state where one can see the ideas, the emotions, and choose to “let them go.” You do not suppress them - you let them go. This can be done by focusing on breathing, or a mantra. That is the technique that most people have found helpful. This stage requires a fair amount of investment. The minimum seems to be about 20 minutes once or twice a day. If you can regularly practice TM or Relaxation Response consistently for 20 minutes every day, you can move to the next stage. This should be a daily exercise - think of it as building mental muscle. 

If 20 minutes seems like a lot - start with 5, or 3. Research indicates that you will get some benefit. Think of it as something like brushing your teeth. It keeps your brain healthy. One exercise is to spend the first few minutes of wakefulness, while in bed, thinking of your loved ones. It will set the tone and color for your whole day.

In some traditions, this level seems to be the ultimate goal. The practitioners get to a place of detachment and abstraction where they can ignore concerns and gain inner calmness. To me, this seems too dispassionate - too disengaged. I am not going to sit in a monastery for hours every day contemplating my brain’s processes. Life is much more than that. There is a whole world out of there of people and things I want to live WITH.

Mindfulness The next stage is where you actually pay attention to what is going on in your world outside of the practice of meditation. I think of this as “waking” mindfulness - being really aware. You need meditation as a muscle building exercise, but you can use the skill in all of life. A really fine piece of music is especially uplifting if you stop and really feel it. A lovely poem can bring on a sense of beauty if you let it. A starry sky, a walk in the woods, a bird’s call - they are all moments to savor and hold on to. Taking out the trash is your contribution to our healthier world. Driving a car can be an exercise in the mechanics of the machine, the social interactions of drivers, the sun on the windshield, the stress of traffic, the risk of an accident. It is no longer an automatic “get me from here to there.” 

At this point, you have managed to quiet your mind somewhat, and you are able to selectively pay attention to specific ideas or sensations. Now you get to choose where to spend your mental energy. How much you can choose may depend on your personal biological and psychological makeup. As in most things, humans are spread out on a spectrum with a bell curve distribution. Most of us are in the “normal” range, but there are always outliers on both ends. If you are in the normal range, as I think I am, this part should come easily. If you are somewhat outside the norm, it may not be that simple.

Emotions This ability to focus is especially helpful with our “gut brain” - our emotions. We have this mental model that we are “thinking” all the time - but that is not really true. We are “feeling” all the time. 90% of our brain activity is emotions. We tend to think that we are rational beings - but we are really emotional and social beings. Our brains are tuned to our social selves - not to our rational selves. The “fast brain” responds automatically. Our “slow brain,” the rational engine, takes a lot of energy and time to get things going. Normally emotions kind of carry us away. When something happens, an emotion responds automatically. It is rare that we can stop and look at it, and actually choose what to do with it. We kind of just run with them. When an "idea" is presented, it generates an emotion in our gut, positive or negative. If it attacks a belief, or our membership in our group or tribe, in our family, in our group, we will get an enormous negative, defensive surge.  See the Lisa Barrett reference. This is also the “fast” and “slow” brain described by Daniel Kahneman. Actually “thinking” is a whole lot of work. “Responding” is quick and automatic. 

With sufficient mental muscle, when an emotion arises, you can pause, look at it, and decide what to do with it. You can be in charge of it. This is basically Steven Covey’s Habit 1 - Be Proactive. Covey was not a scientist, but he figured out how humans work pretty well. (Covey)

Awe At this point, with the constant stream of things somewhat managed, you can now choose where to spend your mental time and energy. I would like to encourage you to start with AWE, and move on to EMPATHY. I think most people are automatically aware of these at some level. But I think it takes some practice to be able to consciously invoke them.

Awe is a general term for the thing that happens in your brain when you see something amazing, a perspective on “life, the universe and everything.” It could be a starry sky, the milky way, a great symphony, a wonderful story, a poem. To me, every living thing is awesome. That this inert pile of matter that is the universe has given rise to living, sentient, feeling beings is totally amazing. I find every one of them beautiful. A few of us have had what is called a “religious experience” of this sort. People report that those are life changing. This is somewhat like that, but a bit more under your control. If you know any one who has had this “experience,” ask them about it. They will enjoy sharing it, and you will learn something significant.

Now that you can manage your stream of consciousness a bit, you can choose to feel every waking moment with this kind of awareness. A walk in the park is amazing. Conversation with friends is great. A painting, a statue, a photograph is moving. Pause, feel it, enjoy it. Don’t just brush it aside and move on. As they say, smell the flowers, live in the moment. You are in charge of this. When someone offends you, you can pause, examine it, and decide how to best respond. When you are drawn to a person, or food or event, you can look at that - take a moment - and decide what to do.

My personal gut says that most people are working on automatic cruise control most of the time. We may someday understand this well enough that it could be a skill we teach in grade school: Reading, Riting, Rithmatic, Realizing. None of those skills are automatic, and we know that most children can learn them easily. We decided within the last few hundred years that our society requires these minimum skills, and we are glad to pay for their education. We should add this one! AND then another on “Practical Economics” - compound interest, debt, etc. Maybe next year? See The Psychology of Money: Timeless lessons on wealth, greed, and happiness - excellent introduction for anyone. But I digress.

Empathy  Meditation or mindfulness needs a moral compass. It is perfectly possible to learn to practice mindfulness with a totally self centered worldview. I think it might be hard to maintain that kind of focus while meditating, but there is no reason to think it cannot be done. It will work out much better for yourself and the rest of us, if you adopt a moral lifestyle that is supportive of generosity and unselfishness. 

So I encourage you to take one more step - to move to Empathy.  I think this is a choice - not an automatic progression. We are social beings - we need each other, we have to figure out how to live together. This is the next level. Empathy is the regard and care we give other people. Every human is an amazing collection of experiences and abilities. Every single one of us is deserving of respect and care. I have learned to carry this about as a kind of ever present mantra. I call it the “I wish you well” mantra. 

From my childhood, I had a very different mantra that constantly played in my brain. I was totally unaware of it. As noted, most of us are unaware of what is playing there most of the time. The skill of meditation or mindfulness, and an intervention from one of my bosses and my dear wife finally brought it to my attention. I had spent every single waking moment comparing myself to other people - and feeling myself superior to them. When I finally saw what was going on, it amazed me that this had colored everything about my life for decades, and I had no awareness whatsoever that it was going on. It took me considerable effort to quiet that constant need to compare and be superior. I found I had to substitute some other idea, some other emotion in order to suppress this negative one. Just as I used a mantra to let go of things, I now use this mantra as a positive one: I wish you well. More on that later.

I Wish You Well I first learned this from a physician at the Mayo Clinic. He suggested that a simple mental model could help with personal stress. I find it works for all kinds of things. The idea is to mentally say to yourself, on every encounter with another person - “I wish you well.” Don’t actually say it - just think it. If you are sincere in that wish, it will change everything about you, inside and out. You will appear more friendly and open to the other person. They will be aware of it at some unconscious level, and they will automatically respond. You can do it on the phone with a smile. You can think it while writing an email and it will color what you say. I have written much more about that here.

I want to emphasize that this is a choice. It is not as automatic as the awe phenomena. One can discuss the moral or psychological implications of this, but I can tell you that it works. Instead of going with the default mental model, which is often one of competition, choose to do this one. You will be amazed at the result in your life and your relationships. 

Life is not a competition There is some research on this that many of us in our culture have a constant mental model of competition. We unconsciously form this mental model that all of life is a competition. We have to be better than, or faster than every person we meet. That is why some of us speed up to get in front just before the exit. That is why some of us sacrifice family and friends and ethics to get a high paying job, with more wealth, a bigger house, a finer car. This mental model, or backdrop, or worldview view is going on in the mind without any conscious awareness. I think it is how most people operate most of the time, at least in our part of the world. We have a kind of hierarchical view of society. We are on such and such a level, others are above or below, and I need to get higher on the scale.  Some of this is from our nation’s culture, some of it is just human. If you are interested in the cultural aspects of this, I highly recommend the book cited by Geert Hofstede in the references. That was another mind altering insight for me.

More Advanced Levels I am no expert at this, but it is my understanding that meditation has many more applications at higher levels. The Herbert Benson book The Relaxation Response cites just a couple of examples of this. Pain management is one. Our body has a physical reaction to some of its parts to inform us of a problem. But our brain’s response to that can be something we manage - not just a reaction. I think I can do this in the dentist’s chair pretty well - but I have totally failed at this for kidney stones. If someone can manage that pain they are a candidate for sainthood. 

The book also mentions a meditation technique for changing a habit, or solving addiction. It feels something like self hypnosis to me. Sam Harris has many more words to say about all of this, if you want to pursue his research. He is a big advocate of psychedelics in this type of treatment and enhanced mental awareness. I tend to treat that with a bit more caution.


A Story

This is my personal “insight” story in some detail.

You can skip this if the above was enough to persuade you to try this discipline. 

Background. My family upbringing gave me a very poor sense of self worth. I was extremely self conscious as a teenager. I had a very low self esteem. To help resolve this, I somehow started a constant mental model that I was in competition with everyone, and that I was better than them. I happened to be somewhat brighter than average, so the model worked fairly well. It gave me enough confidence to struggle on. But it was a terrible operating philosophy. The mental state you have about others leaks out all the time – you are projecting a model which their pattern recognition engine picks up. And the sharper ones will be able to see exactly what you are doing. 

The scariest or most insightful part of this is that I had absolutely no idea that this mental process was going on. I did it all the time, but I was not actually aware that I was doing it. It was just part of my mental view of  the world. We interpret everything through a screen that filters reality, our “story.” The genius part of this is that you can become aware of that story, and you can change it.

Insight: I had not realized what I was doing with this mental framework of competition until an event brought it home to me very clearly. I had just been promoted to a much higher position in the company – I was now an “officer.” I shook hands with the CEO. They put a dozen roses on my desk, and doubled my salary. Great. I went to my first officer’s staff meeting – the senior management of our division. There were about 1,200 people in the division, in about 6 departments. I was now one of those department heads. When I walked into the meeting room, I could see that there was a kind of hierarchy. The boss sat at one end of the table, and the senior folk sat near him. So, not being a total dummy, I went down near the other end to find a seat. We never had “assigned” seats, but you get the picture. We had some discussion, and the boss introduced a new topic. He stated the question, and then asked the guy at the other end of the table across from me what he thought about the issue. He wisely started as far from me as he could – I could watch and learn how this works. The next person spoke, and the discussion moved up the hierarchy. The department head next to the boss, Al D., was speaking, and he said something that I disagreed with. So, I spoke up to tell him what I thought. Well, that stopped all of the discussion. The boss changed topics, and on we went. I wondered about that, but I soon forgot about it.

Later that week, I had my one on one with the boss. We went over what was going on, and as I was about to leave, he said, “Oh yes, I want you to go and apologize to Al D. for what you said in the staff meeting.” I said, “What?! Why should I apologize?” He said, “You offended him with your comments.” I tried to argue – no I didn’t, nothing like that happened. Instead of arguing, the boss just stood up and shouted at me: “Go apologize!” I said, “Yes sir” – and left. I went directly to Al D.’s office. I still could not believe what the boss had told me. I would never insult Al – what was he thinking? I walked in, and started with: “Al, I don’t know what I said at the staff meeting, but if it offended you in any way, I sincerely want to apologize.” He was very gracious, and he accepted my apology. He clearly had been offended. Evidently, everyone in the room had seen it. And I had no clue what I had done. How on earth could I offend someone like that in a meeting and not even realize I was doing it! 

That evening, after dinner, I was talking with my lovely wife, and I recounted this story to her. When I got to the punch line, she rolled her eyes. She did! As if to say, I can’t believe he just said that. So I said: “Wait – what?” She said, “You do it all the time.” Me: “What do I do all the time?” She: “You sound like an arrogant SOB when you argue with people.” What! Good Lord, I was thinking. How could that be? How could I have not been aware of this?

The next day, I had my own staff meeting with the department supervisors. I did not tell them the whole story, but I did say something like, “It has come to my attention that sometimes I come off like an arrogant SOB. And I know it is hard to believe, but I was totally unaware that I was doing this, and I want to stop it. I would appreciate it if you see me doing it, you bring it to my attention.” More rolled eyeballs – like they are going to criticize the boss to his face. Not going to happen! Man, I was thinking. This is really something. What is going on?

Fortunately, I had the opportunity to reflect on this, and I had the benefit of Steven Covey’s course on 7 Habits. After some work and reflection, it slowly dawned on me that for most of my life, I had been walking around with a mental model where I was in competition with everyone I met, and I had to be better than them. In every encounter, I would see someone, measure them up, and decide that I was better – so there. It was a constant thing running in my brain ALL THE TIME. I would be distributing communion, or serving people a meal, or just walking by them, and that comparison game was going on – ALL THE TIME. It is kind of hard to believe, but that is what I was doing. It literally took me years to get that running stream of consciousness out of my head, and to adopt a “I wish you well” framework – but I did it! So I know that you can do it too – put your mind to it. 

Hopefully you do not have as problematic a “worldview” as I did. The key thing is to recognize that some kind of program and filter is running in there all the time - try to pay attention to it and choose what you want it to do. It could be improved. Don’t be a victim of your automatic mental model. My totally uninformed guess is that about 80% of us are operating in that mode most of the time.



References

Barrett, Lisa Feldman, How Emotions are Made. I just mentioned in passing that our “ideas” are really “emotions.” This book explores the research behind that. This is a complex scientific work, by a preeminent neuroscientist. See her wikipedia entry. The theory is fairly new and somewhat debated. I think it is a brilliant insight, because it fits perfectly with all of the other evidence I have found. (DUH! That is called confirmation bias !) This is a “theory” but it is based on empirical research, not opinion. For a more populist explanation, see her much shorter book: Seven and a half Lessons about the Brain. She also has a TED talk you might enjoy.

Benson, Herbert, and Miriam Z. Klipper, The Relaxation Response (1992) This book opens the door to the TM technique, and explains its power in scientific terms.

Benson, Herbert, Beyond the Relaxation Response: The Stress-Reduction Program That Has Helped Millions of Americans (2019) This is a more recent summary of some of the best recent research into TM. It does not hold itself out to teach TM, but that is just what it does. He provides a simple, step by step introduction to the first level of TM. No charge. The four basic components for eliciting the Relaxation Response are: a quiet environment, a mental device (known as a mantra in most forms of meditation), a passive attitude, and a comfortable position. To get a feel for this, you can watch this short video where he teaches the technique. https://youtu.be/nBCsFuoFRp8. This article in Psychology Today is also a good introduction: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/heart-and-soul-healing/201303/dr-herbert-benson-s-relaxation-response And here is a shorthand description of the technique - which you can download. http://catholiccharitiesla.org/wp-content/uploads/Managing-Stress-The-Relaxation-Response-TS-2-04.pdf

I had the extreme good fortune to be exposed to Dr. Covey in my work environment, and the gift of being able to teach this exercise to many people. There is no overt science in Covey’s approach - just lots of wisdom from his analysis of self help texts and teaching experience. If you have the opportunity, sign up for this course. It is full of “practical wisdom.” It changed my life and my relationship with my family and friends. 

Harris, Sam. Using Meditation to Focus, View Consciousness & Expand Your Mind 
https://youtu.be/-wIt_WsJGfw 
This is the commentary from the YouTube site:
My guest is Sam Harris, Ph.D. Sam earned his bachelor’s degree in philosophy from Stanford University and his doctorate (Ph.D.) in neuroscience from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). He is the author of multiple best-selling books and is a world-renowned public-facing intellectual on meditation, consciousness, free will, psychedelics and neuroscience. He is also the creator of Waking Up and the host of the Making Sense podcast. In this episode, we discuss meditation as a route to understanding “the self” and experiencing consciousness, not just changing one’s conscious state. Sam describes several meditation techniques and their benefits, including how meditation fundamentally changes our worldview and how it can be merged seamlessly into daily life. It can help us overcome universal challenges such as distractibility and persistent, internal dialogue (“chatter”) to allow for deep contentment and pervasive shifts in our awareness, all while acknowledging the more immediate stress-lowering and memory-improving effects of meditation. We also discuss the therapeutic use of psychedelics and the mechanistic similarities between the benefits of a psychedelic journey and long-term meditation practices. And we discuss the rationale behind Sam’s recent decision to close his social media (Twitter) account. This episode should interest anyone wanting to learn more about the higher order functions of the brain, the brain-body connection, consciousness and, of course, meditation and why and how to meditate for maximum benefit.

Harris, Sam, Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion. 
He also has a very interesting podcast: Making Sense.You can also find him on many YouTube interviews like the one cited above.

Harris, Sam, Yuval Noah Harari,  https://youtu.be/mT4HpBsZPsA 
This is a purloined audio from a Harris podcast: From the Making Sense Podcast / Episode #138 The Edge of Humanity. Harari describes his first meditation experience. I found it enlightening.

Henriques, Gregg, PhD, What Is Mindfulness and How Does It Work? This is a formal article from a popular journal introducing the same ideas. 

This research shows the power of this unconscious framework or mental model, and how it differs by culture or nation. The book was originally published decades ago, and the most recent revision adds a lot more data and insight. This publication changed my whole way of thinking about human society. I am still amazed that this has not become the common wisdom for international relations and business. But  . . . 

Kahneman, Daniel, Thinking, Fast and Slow.
One of my very favorite books. I learned something amazing on almost every page. Kahneman is a psychologist, and he won the Nobel Prize in Economics for his theories about how people make decisions. If you still think you are primarily a rational animal, this research will help persuade you otherwise.

Pink, Daniel, When: The Scientific Secrets of Perfect Timing.
This is an excellent book. Pink generally looks at lots of research, and then writes a nice summary of it to make it available to the rest of us. He has one chapter on mindfulness that I found very helpful. This is from page 217. I liken his idea of “awe” to the religious experience that many people describe.

“The other study examined the effect of awe. Awe lives ‘in the upper reaches of pleasure and on the boundary of fear,’ as two scholars put it. It ‘is a little studied emotion . . . central to the experience of religion, politics, nature and art.’ It has two key attributes: vastness (the experience of something larger than ourselves) and accommodation (the vastness forces us to adjust our mental structures). 
Melanie Rudd, Kathleen Vohs, and Jennifer Aaker found that the experience of awe – the sight of the Grand Canyon, the birth of a child, a spectacular thunderstorm – changes our perception of time. When we experience awe, time slows down. It expands. We feel like we have more of it. And that sensation lifts our well-being. ‘Experiences of awe bring people into the present moment, and being in the present moment underlies awe’s capacity to adjust time perception, influence decisions, and make life feel more satisfying than it would otherwise.’
Taken together, all of these studies suggest that the path to a life of meaning and significance isn’t to ‘live in the present’ as so many spiritual gurus have advised. It is to integrate our perspectives on time into a coherent whole, one that helps us comprehend who we are and why we’re here.”

This book is by Dr. Sood, the speaker that introduced me to the idea of the 3 minute meditation each morning. He also taught about wishing people well – and its power.
You can watch the whole talk here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZIGekgoaz4 

Copyright 2023 Carl Scheider




Wednesday, June 14, 2023

What’s Our Problem - Book Review and Comments

 What’s Our Problem - Book Review and Comments


This is about this book: What's Our Problem?: A Self-Help Book for Societies by Tim Urban. He is the author of this popular blog: Wait But Why  The latest blog entry at this date is his experience of his first child’s birth - also worth a read.

If you just want an overview of the book, go to the Amazon link above. He wrote the summary there. He spent 6 years writing the book. At one point, it had twice the number of pages published. With a lot of research and a lot of help, he got it pared down a bit.


I really encourage you to read the book. Jude says that I say this about every new book I pick up - but THIS ONE is really important, interesting, life changing, and could help save our democracy. Superlatives abound. It is also a lot of fun, and “graphically illustrated” - kind of. The last few chapters are the best part - but if you skip to those you will not quite get what is going on. 


I write these blog entries for a couple of reasons. For one thing, I retain things better if I write them down. It forces me to organize ideas, form connections, etc. The other motive is that I really want to share them, and discuss them with someone - anyone. If this one strikes you, send me a note, an email, a comment. 


So, how to entice you to read it? I am your standard progressive, liberal kind of male octogenarian. In the course of reading this book I learned a ton of new things about our culture, our democracy and myself. Let me lay out a few of my “strange” ideas that you might also be suffering from. 


Short List of My New Learnings

This is a list of things which I discovered I had not understood correctly.

  • Critical Race Theory 

  • White Privilege

  • Transgender persuasion or education

  • JK Rowling’s transphobic opinions

  • Diversity is always a good goal.

  • Google Memo on gender differences in IT

  • Police are killing blacks disproportionately 

  • Racism in the U.S. has gotten worse

  • Women are paid less than men for comparable work

  • Trans women of color have a shorter life expectancy.

  • Most people of the “other political persuasion” are not thinking rationally.

  • The extreme left are a small and insignificant part of the Democratic party.

  • Universities support open idea exchange


I want to assure you that there are many more insights in the book - this is just to whet your appetite. And I am willing to bet that my grandkids have no idea about the origin of that expression: “whet your appetite” - just as they have no clue what “prime the pump” comes from. But  . . . 


Expanded List of My New Learnings

  • Critical Race Theory.
    My prior view of this topic was that it was a tempest in a teapot. The ultra conservatives are resisting it for no good reason. Turns out, there are two manifestations of this thing. The “liberal” one - my view - is that this is a fair and accurate examination of our history as a nation, and the history of slavery as a human institution. Slavery was perverse, and universal, and the fact that we finally understood that and outlawed it is a huge accomplishment. We should teach and celebrate that. This is the view of the “Social Justice Liberals”, or “Progressives” in my vocabulary. See Bury the Chains: Prophets and Rebels in the Fight to Free an Empire's Slaves. by Adam Hochschild 
    Turns out, what the conservatives are opposed to is a totally different program supported by the far left, the group the author calls  “Social Justice Fundamentalism”, or SJF proponents. These folk are pushing Critical Race Theory as a kind or racist teaching curriculum, not a descriptive history term. They are basically teaching people how to be racist, in a perverse fashion. They are committed to removing the social negatives that are embedded in our world view by pushing an extreme, contrary racism. This is not history - this is not based on any science or fact. This is a biased, hateful approach to all humans. The author describes these classes and curriculums in great detail - it would make me ill to think that my children would be exposed to this kind of craziness in school, and our family is multiracial! 

  • White Privilege.
    I read a whole book on this topic, and agreed wholeheartedly with the author’s understanding of the problem. By the good fortune of being born with fair skin, from a European heritage, my current world accords me many advantages that have nothing to do with my skill, ability, or hard work. This was especially true when I was growing up during the 40s and 50s. That is simply an undeniable fact.
    But this term, “White Privilege” has been cast by the extreme left, the SJF, as a blanket condemnation of all individuals of fair complexion. It could be called “white guilt” - and there is a book by that title that I have also read. This book and this approach has not a scintilla of research or evidence supporting the view - just opinions and condemnations. Those white folk are not accorded any room for discussion or debate. That white group is told to be quiet. Anyone of a darker hue who protests that they are not affected by this syndrome or atmosphere is considered to be non rational, a traitor, or worse. This is reverse racism. This is a non rational approach to a significantly complex social problem - and it is not helping. People of a conservative bent are rightly upset about that kind of stupidity, as should we all.

  • Transgender persuasion or education.
    I thought the extreme right were simply opposed to all transgender support efforts. Many of them are, but the more moderate folk are focused on a very different beast. There is a decent amount of data that indicates that many more young women are now questioning their gender as a result of all of the publicity and discussion about gender identity. The number of young men going through this seems stable. The concern is that the simple fact of being a woman in today’s still male dominated world is enough to cause some questions in any young woman. We should not rush to introduce biological therapies, some of which are irreversible, when young people are still highly persuadable and impressionable. See JK Rowling’s concern below.

  • JK Rowling as transphobic.
    I saw a whole flurry of articles in the media about JK Rowling being somehow transphobic - upset about the push for recognizing trans teens or some such. I figured she had some quirk in that area, and it was not my problem. After reading some of this book, I decided to go check. I did a Google search on the topic. The first few hits were popular magazine articles exploring how terrible this was and lamenting the damage to her reputation, etc. Even articles defending her assumed that she was transphobic.
    Looking further down the search list, I found her website, and a lengthy piece that she penned there to explain her concerns. You might also read it (see below) - and then tell me how this concern could have possibly given her the reputation of being transphobic. I know she is wealthy and she will survive this, but she has suffered enormous loss to her public image and probably some income to a totally trumped up case with no basis. What she describes is a very real concern based on her own experience as a woman and the data that is available about the numbers of trans teens. It seems likely that many young women are being persuaded to undertake biological therapy without need. It is a well balanced, careful argument that our society and government need to be careful here. I have to admit that Twitter and her tweets there have not helped this perspective at all, but the criticism is way over the top. I am NOT a fan of Twitter.
    https://www.jkrowling.com/opinions/j-k-rowling-writes-about-her-reasons-for-speaking-out-on-sex-and-gender-issues/
    https://www.jkrowling.com/opinions/my-article-for-the-sunday-times-scotland-on-why-i-oppose-gender-recognition-act-reform/ 

  • Diversity is always a good goal.
    At first glance, that seems like a commendable thing. Any group is better if it represents our full population - be it “race”, “gender”, conservative, liberal, etc.
    But the far left see it very differently. It has to be a mathematical precision, with no other values considered. Blind auditions is one good example that shows how ridiculous this is. Major orchestras introduced this blind audition method to ensure that a racial or gender bias was not affecting their decisions for promoting and hiring capable musicians. The candidate performs behind a screen, and they are judged based solely on their performance.  Page 591 
    “In 2020, The New York Times published an article arguing that orchestras should end blind auditions, because they produced orchestras that were not diverse enough, with too many Asian and white musicians. The writer was adhering to Kendi’s definition of an antiracist. The policy of auditioning musicians without seeing who they were was producing an outcome with a racial disparity—and was therefore a racist policy.”
    The extremists are unhappy with this because the results are not as diverse numerically as the general population of candidates. A disproportionate number of “asians” are excellent musicians, and we have disproportionately less representation from “people of color.”  The extreme folk want to fix the problem by juggling the numbers. What we should be doing is working to understand why there is this difference, and determine how we want to attack the cause of that disparity to resolve the problem. Just adjusting the numbers is NOT solving the problem, but rather hiding it, and it is also “reverse racism” against those folks with better abilities. 

  • Google Memo on gender differences in IT.
    In this case, a Google employee wrote a very balanced and critical memo to Google management about their diversity programs. He had many suggestions about how to improve things for correcting their male / female disparity in hiring and promotion. All I ever saw of that initially was that he was a biased antifeminist, complaining that his male gender was not being treated fairly for unscientific reasons. He was criticized in the press, in the public, and he was fired by Google.
    Having read the actual memo, it is a wonderfully crafted document, based on research and statistics, and is very supportive of diversity and inclusion. It recommends practical methods for Google to improve their gender balance. You can see this discussion on page 502 of the book. Read the actual memo here:
    https://web.archive.org/web/20170809021151/https://diversitymemo.com/
    (That link should download it. If it stops working, drop me a note - I have a copy.)
    So what happened? The media and the SJF attached a “straw man” memo that the author never wrote. They characterized the attack as a biased, negative reaction to their efforts to achieve gender balance. Within Google and “The Media”, virtually no one defended the author and the actual memo - and he was terminated. When good folk say nothing,  bad things happen. You can read more about that here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google%27s_Ideological_Echo_Chamber 

  • Police are killing blacks disproportionately
    I do my best to stay up on the news. It was my impression that police kill many more blacks than whites in any set of circumstances - armed, crime, traffic stop, etc. In a sense, I put some of this down to a higher crime rate in black populations. None of that is supported by any factual basis.
    “A 2019 survey asked 980 people from across the political spectrum how many unarmed Black men they believed were killed by police (by shooting or any other means) in 2019. That year, 31 unarmed Black men were killed by police. All groups overestimated the number, with those on the political left being the farthest off. Fifty-four percent of the “very liberal” group were off by a factor of over 30X, while 22% of that group were off by a factor of over 300X.” Page 562
    So, we had 31 unarmed black men killed by police. Estimates from liberal folk ranged from 300 to 9,000. The problem is in the news coverage.
    “Between 2016 and 2022, 326 unarmed white men and 232 unarmed Black men were killed (by any means) by police in the U.S. Media coverage of these incidents has been highly skewed, with the median story about a Black victim receiving nine times the coverage as the median story about a white victim.”
    In actual fact, more unarmed white men were killed by police than unarmed black men. The truly terrible crimes committed against people like George Floyd and others made those much more newsworthy. On the other side of that, we really do not know whether the killing of white men had some similarly shocking circumstances. 

  • Racism in the U.S. has gotten worse
    Prior to the election of 2016, I thought we were making decent progress against racism. After that election and the clearly racist support of many I thought perhaps it had just gone undercover, and was waiting for a spokesperson to make it legitimate to voice those opinions again.
    But the facts indicate that racism is declining in our opinion and in fact. Sources are cited in the text.
    “A Pew question asks Americans whether they believe “racial discrimination is the main reason why many Blacks can’t get ahead.” The percentage of Black respondents answering “yes” steadily decreased starting in the mid-1990s, suggesting that Black Americans’ feeling of agency was on the rise. This makes sense, given the amount of promising data pointing to improving conditions for Black Americans—both the Black poverty rate and the Black unemployment rate have dropped to all-time lows, while both the Black incarceration rate and the disparity between the Black and white incarceration rate have been steadily declining over the past 20 years. But the SJF narrative tells the opposite kind of story, and this could be contributing to a sharp reversal in Black Americans’ sense of empowerment in recent years.”  Page 584                            
    The SJF, extreme left, are preaching a totally different story, which makes black Americans feel even worse about our problems, and less trusting of the police.

  • Women are paid less than men for comparable work
    This one is interesting, as you see these numbers cited everywhere, all the time. I have regularly seen estimates of 30 to 40% less for “comparable” work. But it is simply not true. If you take the data and break it down by age, profession, etc. the actual documented difference is about 1%.
    “According to the website Payscale, when controlling for “all compensable variables”—i.e., when comparing apples to apples—the gender wage gap drops dramatically, from 18% to 1%. Women earn 99 cents—not 77 or 80 or 83 cents—for every dollar a man makes, for the same work.” Page 585
    Hmmm. Looking at the Payscale website and their recent press releases, one would get the impression that this statement in the book is not exactly true. See: https://www.payscale.com/press-releases/women-stand-to-lose-900000-in-lifetime-earnings-payscales-gender-pay-gap-report-shows/
    Payscale has good data, but it is also pushing an agenda for selling its expertise. Numbers are flexible things if you have an agenda. I guess the simplest thing to say here that this is NOT a simple problem, and is not going away in a hurry. I did find this interesting:
    “The gender pay gap is also closing in some locations. Women are paid the same as men overall for coastal metros that include Los Angeles, San Diego, ​San ​Jose, Portland, and Washington, D.C. The metros with the largest controlled and uncontrolled gender pay gaps are situated across America’s heartland, such as St. Louis, Pittsburgh, and Kansas City.”

  • Trans women of color have a shorter life expectancy
    The number cited most often is 35 years, less than half of the normal female lifespan. This was cited in a recent Emmy Awards program, and repeated in virtually all of the leading news outlets.This was news to me. As cited in the book there are many articles describing this "fact," but none of them cited a legitimate source, or any data supporting the claim. Best case the news media is incredibly sloppy for some topics. Worst case our more ardent progressives are not above simply making things up to advance the cause. That never turns out well. See: https://www.thestranger.com/slog/2019/09/23/41471629/is-the-life-expectancy-of-trans-women-in-the-us-just-35-no 

  • Most people of the “other political persuasion” are not thinking rationally.
    I have to confess that I am prone to this one. Jordan Klepper would provide all the data I need about the folks on the right. Turns out though, exactly the same is true of most of us - left or right. And the extreme left may have a larger vocabulary, but their thought police as even worse than non rational - they are downright fascist. 

  • The extreme left are a small and insignificant part of the Democratic party.
    They may be small in number, but the extreme left are now dominating our educational and research institutions in an incredible fashion. The author offers many, many examples where more moderate liberals cannot voice a concern about any “woke” issue without literally losing their jobs and reputation to the “liberal” media and protests. I do not see a huge funded conspiracy here as has been alleged about the Koch brothers on the right. But the fact is that “diversity goals” and “safe speech” are now coloring every type of university research and education. This is even true in purely physical science fields where they have no place. In many institutions the majority of liberal faculty are too afraid to even voice a concern, as their colleagues have been similarly dismissed for doing the same. This is a HUGE problem. This is the whole focus of the book - how can we possibly counter the impact of this tiny, extreme view of racist ideas?

  • Universities support open idea exchange
    There is a spectrum of conservative and liberal universities, and the liberal are more numerous. The number of faculty members who identify as conservatives in any survey has rapidly declined. In the top 5 schools, no faculty member was brave enough to indicate that they were conservative or Republican.
    That is one problem, but well beyond that, every moderate liberal faculty member must now defend themselves against the cultural diversity police. Universities have diversity boards, focused on purity and numbers. These groups call out any faculty or students who simply voice a more moderate opinion of the problems facing our society. The author cites many instances where moderate faculty have been roundly condemned by students and fired for expressing their opinions. The result is that no one can even mention that they might disagree with these extreme “thought police.” Things like “speech codes,” “free speech zones,” and “safe areas,” are the new code for “you cannot even express those ideas here.” This is really bad news.


Point of Disagreement

I have one area of disagreement with the author, and I intend to raise that to him in some fashion. He has a quote from Isabel Wilklerson and her book Caste. He cites her statement as another example of this extreme left view. I think he is taking too simplistic a cast on that one - intentional play on words. What Caste describes is not an enforced view that is not amenable to rational discussion of the problem. It is rather a carefully researched and nuanced evaluation that we are all impacted by an unconscious, unaware mental bias about our position in our society. The problem is that this tendency is so far below our normal awareness that it is not amenable to rational discussion. Ms. Wilkerson has done us the service of bringing it to our attention. And she is not forcing us to believe that - it is simply a matter of looking at the evidence.  I wrote a lengthy piece on that which you can read here if you are so inclined.
https://carlscheider.blogspot.com/2021/04/finally-i-understand-what-is-wrong-with.html 


Steps To Take

This is a shorthand note of the steps he recommends for us to take to try to counter this extreme left, and to better communicate with the moderate right. Page 659 ff.

  1. Courage level 1: Stop saying stuff you don’t believe.
    To really do this, we all need to spend some time THINKING about what we do believe - not just where we happen to be following along.
    I think I have this one in hand - how about you? I used to let people think I was a believing Catholic. When I was accidentally outed, I decided to let it ride. I think going public with my unbelief would have cost me a city council election . I know of a few local politicians who claim membership in the “christian” church called Universalist Unitarianism. That group of folk are not overtly atheistic, but you do not need to believe in any deity to be a formal member. In my case, my “coming out” to our most recent clerical pastor resulted in my being banned from reading during liturgy, or holding any leadership position in our church’s volunteer activities. I am hopeful that my visibility may help a few others be more open to their religious questions.
    On the political scene, I always felt that I was an independent. Running for office at the local level never required any identified political party. I was significantly honored when a local group of active Republicans tried to recruit me to run for our State Legislature. I considered it a high compliment - but I assured them that my mother would turn over in her grave if I did that.

  2. Courage level 2: Start saying what you really think, in private, with people you know well
    I feel pretty good about this one. I do my very best to never mislead anyone about anything. But I have to confess that in a mixed group, I will keep my opinions to myself just to avoid conflict. If people know me at all, our family’s multi-racial makeup pretty much keeps people from engaging in racist discussions. That generally impacts political topics as well. But I have to admit, that even in a private family discussion, I will not raise my voice if I think it will just upset people. I am pretty sure I would object if I felt someone else was being harmed by an erroneous opinion - but I do not travel much in circles where that occurs.

  3. Courage level 3: Go public
    And here we are - a public blog stating strong political views, etc. But this thing has zero impact - well almost zero. Did not mean to malign you personally now that you have read all the way to the bottom. My Apologies.


SO?

So - what do you think? What can you do to help us out here? Thanks.
Stay safe out there.