Some interesting ideas from Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel
Kahneman.
I was visiting with some friends the
other day, and because of the conversation, I felt morally obliged to introduce them
to this book: Thinking, Fast and Slow by
Daniel Kahneman. I would be negligent if
I did not also point the few readers of this blog in the same direction.
This is a VERY interesting book. I learned more from it than any I have read of
late. I actually created a “cheat sheet”
of the main ideas to help me remember them. Let me give you a bit of an overview of the contents,
to entice you to read it.
Overview
The author of this book is a psychologist,
who has been researching how we make decisions for decades. He won the Nobel
Prize for economics for his explanation into how humans really make economic decisions.
The basic insight is that we are barely rational. Most of our decisions are from
our gut, our instinct. He calls that our “fast brain”. We react to things quickly,
and instinctually, because evolution tuned us to do that as a survival mechanism.
For really complex problems we do engage our “slow brain”, but it is a lot of work,
we can’t do it when we are tired, or have been thinking a lot, or are hungry, etc.
The book is full of experiments that give
great insight into how we actually make decisions.
Why is this a big deal? Because most people are making economic and political
decisions that affect ALL of us from their gut instinct, not from any rational argument
or thinking. And the result is what you might expect – this is not a rational way
to deal with our economic and political reality.
Here are a couple of short hand examples,
just to entice you to read the whole book.
1. Election prediction. People were shown two pictures of candidates running
for a political office, and asked which one won. They guessed the winner correctly in 70% of the
cases, by just looking at the pictures for a fraction of a second. The winners tend
to have a strong chin and a confident smile.
2. Libertarian Economics. The Austrian School
of economics, or the Libertarians (think Mises, Ayn Rand and Ron Paul) are working on the
premise that humans make rational, economic decisions. We should, therefore, let
them make decisions that are free from other constraints as much as possible. It’s
called the free market. In fact, most economists are working on the same premise. But
humans are not really rational about their economic decisions. We are persuaded
by fears, prejudices, recent history, misinformation and outright lies much more
than by any rational argument. Any policy based on these abstract theoretical economic
theories is doomed to failure.
3. Investments. We have something called an illusion of understanding or expertise. If
I know a lot about a topic, I am persuaded that I make good decisions in that realm. Facts will not persuade me otherwise. In the investment
world, it becomes the “illusion of stock picking skill”. In fact, based on mountains
of statistical evidence, everyone is absolutely wretched about identifying good investments,
or predicting any future event, because our rational thinking is so clouded by this
illusion. Based on one chapter of this book,
I dropped my “advisor” approach to managing my investments with a broker, saving
myself several thousand dollars per year in fees. I adopted a low cost approach,
and feel much more comfortable about my investment strategy. This is not really
news to anyone – it is a purely random walk, a dart throw – you name it.
4. Cognitive Ease. If we have heard something before, even if we knew
it was a lie or wrong at that time, we are much more predisposed to believe it the
next time we hear it. I think our political candidates understand this one all too
well.
That
should be enough to entice you to read the book. Trust me on this. Remember, I’m pulling for you. We’re all in this together.
Update: 2015.07.31
Just to entice you further, here's a nice summary of some of the key ideas in this book, complete with illustrations of the cartoon type - you might find it equally interesting.
https://blog.bufferapp.com/thinking-mistakes-8-common-mistakes-in-how-we-think-and-how-to-avoid-them
Update: 2015.07.31
Just to entice you further, here's a nice summary of some of the key ideas in this book, complete with illustrations of the cartoon type - you might find it equally interesting.
https://blog.bufferapp.com/thinking-mistakes-8-common-mistakes-in-how-we-think-and-how-to-avoid-them
Carl, thanks for writing. The bit on economics is a common fallacy for which I forgive your falling into the trap. Libertarians and Austrians believe dramatically less than mainstream Keynesian economists in rational action. For mainstream economists, models can be drawn up and deduced using rational decision making as a core assumption, and ideal policies can be deduced from the models. For Austrians and libertarians, the driving force is self-interest, rational or irrational. Believers in minimal government realize that government is not altruistic and omnipotent -- instead, it is made of people who make rational or irrational self-interested decisions like you and me. The difference with people in government is that government is the only agent of force in the society -- the people there force win-lose. Maybe you're on the winner side, maybe the loser, so maybe you're happy with the power structure or not on a particular issue. Markets, on the other hand, are win-win -- and from the irrational, dysfunctional, emotional (but voluntary!) choices come mutually agreed-upon decisions that serve both sides' self-interest as they see or feel it in that moment. Why would you trust your own irrational, emotional decisions to politicians? Thanks again.
ReplyDeleteHmmm. Interesting comment - sorry I had not read it sooner. I have discovered from Jonathan Haidt that libertarians are a different breed entirely. MUCH more rational - you are right there - but totally without empathy. I am not sure that they are any better at understanding how people operate than any other "school" or "sect" of economics. Have you read "Misbehaving" by Thaler? Check out Haidt's analysis of libertarian propensities as well. AND . . . keep thinking! It's pretty rare.
Delete